Skip to main content

A Theology of Art: Part One


Introduction


A professor once challenged me to write a theology of art. I was a student at Briercrest College, graduating with a Bachelor of Art in Theology. During my exit interview, from my statement of beliefs, the professor drew attention to an errant vacuum in what I had hastily drawn up. “You are an artist. Why isn’t this reflected here?” He asked. I was embarrassed. As an artist and theologian, I had failed. One of the most distinct characteristics of my person was left out of how I relate to God. What came after was grace. He, and the other professor attending, offered a conditional pass. From there he issued his challenge to me first as an artist (the manner in how he related to me) and second a theologian, was to arrive at a personal theology of art.

It has been six years since I graduated. Challenge accepted.











Chapter One

What is Art?


Genesis 1:1
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

Art is necessary. It is not without purpose, not apathetic or unfeeling. As an expression and outflowing of God’s power, it has vision, it is emotive, and reaches out to touch. As an aspect of relating to God, a theology of art is sorely needed.

Art is creative expression. It is the genetic inheritance we gained from our heavenly father. I do not believe for a second there is a person on earth who does not have the urge to create. We are only separated by quality.

Quality is the criteria that divides us into categories. This is not to say that division is inherently bad. Au contraire, we were created unique. It is because of this division why we have the spectrum of the arts: visual, performance, literature etc. And while not all will gain notoriety for art (I am looking at you, notebook doodlers), we all create along some manner, usually with pleasure, with emotion.

Art is emotional. Since it is a personal expression, it will express the individual’s condition. Whether it is good or bad, we will react to it. There can be no vacuum in reaction, since all art has a purpose or vision.

No artist just paints, writes, or sculpts etc. All art has purpose. Every artist has a vision for their creation whether they are aware of it or not. Even landscape paintings have purpose. There are no accidents (unless you qualify it as modern art).

All these are aspects of what I consider to be art. Since I identify myself as a painter and writer, I will draw most of my illustrations and points from those avenues.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The mystery of God

                Mystery is not an enemy. Answers are not the goal. For how much do we know with certainty? How much about God is revealed? We have the scriptures, through which our forefathers agreed upon some few tenants gathered together into a creed, the Apostles creed, and later the Nicene Creed. We know those things, however through them we have some dissension on meaning. We, for the majority agree upon the hypostatic union of the son. We agree upon His life, death, and resurrection. All this in great scope however is small in comparison to the entirety of the Godhead and His nature. He expects us to marvel at His complexity, to worship. He is beyond cosmic.                 We have studied the cosmos and know little. A hypercube is less complex than God. we can state this confidently. We know God to be eternal and a hypercube to be finite. Carl Sagan gave a fant...

What I did not say

A comment was made on my recent post from a former colleague and friend. It cut at something I should have been more precise with. The very word “complexity” is multi-faceted. What I provided was an oversimplification. In terms of the nature of God, my use of complexity could be read and attributed to three things: character, oneness, and substance. What I was referring to was the latter, substance. God’s substance, his being, is eternal. The due criticism pointed to me using complexity as a misattribution to God’s character and oneness.   Further points of the critique alluded to a traditional sense of the word complex: being comprised of multiple things. While I wholeheartedly agree with this critique, and am indeed in line with Him being one, if I am to harangue anything, it is that the understandability of God’s substance is on the line, not the complexity of his character, or His oneness. We know, through Scriptures, of God’s character, primarily His love towards us. ...